Ok...well not that it matters but I too have experience in this field. Like I said felony interrogations are supposed to be visually recorded (with audio). There are situations that only allow for audio recording, like when visual recording capabilities are unavailable, and there are times when only audio recording is necessary. All "in custody" juvenile interrogations are to be recorded, typically this in done with audio equipement such as a microcassette recorder. Field interrogations may be done with audio recording. If its a serious case such as a serious felony you can bet we will find visual and audio recording capabilities. You must also remember statutes are subject to interpretation. That means they are subject to interpretation and an officer or deputy must follow local policies and procedures, which usually at least mirror and some times are more stringent.

It reads electronically recorded and deals with mostly juveniles. The WI Chief's and Sheriff's assocations along with most DA'S office want those to be taped. The video portion is not required. Get your facts correct. I can post the link to the actual statute's. Felonly interrogations take place in all different area's in custodial settings, prisons etc. Most don't have the ability to be recorded other than with a digital recorder. I have lots of expertise in this......

Felony interrogations are supposed to be video taped (with audio). Audio recordings can be used in the field for interviews (hence microcassette recorders do come in handy). In some circumstances audio recordings can also be used for for juvenile and adult interrogations, when video recording is unavailable.

The story says video taping. Which is true?

I believe the law that was passed was for audio taping! They could have purchased small recorders and accomplished the same thing for way cheaper!