Comments by whybesad
Page 1 of 1
Posted on March 27 at 10:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Keep Laura on. If you want to listen to far left thinking just listen to Stans show in the morning he seems to like to bring in democrats more than conservatives.
Posted on February 20 at 6:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Another tax. Imagine that. Don't we already pay taxes to pay for street repairs?
On Wheel tax
Posted on February 13 at 1:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If your in poverty how can you afford a car?
Posted on February 7 at 4:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If Macain, Hillary or Obama win we are still going to have a democrat in office. Hold on to your pocketbook!!!
Posted on February 5 at 12:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We are going to have change no matter what President Bush isn't running again. I can't imagine having Hillary running the country.
Posted on January 31 at 1:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought is was alright. He has never been know for his speeches. He wants to get the things he has presented before done. Why should he start new objectives? He only has less than a year left. In Government a year isn't long enough to get anything done.
Posted on January 29 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I will be spending it. And no they can't tax you on it. It is a TAX rebate it's money that we paid in taxes. So, I will be spending it on a nice new plasma TV.
Posted on January 22 at 10:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bill Broydrick is a little mislead in his liberal views. He claims that President Bush doesn't want to cover children with health insurance. In fact the President did veto a bill that would have covered all children whether they were already covered under their parents health insurance or not. But, the president did sign a bill to cover children that aren't able to get insurance or, who are not currently covered under their parents insurance. So, he should get his facts straight.
Posted on January 16 at 4:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jim Doyle has always said he was for the poor people. Well, this tax hits poor people much harder than it does people with money. Tim pointed out a great point that there are people digging for change to pay for the cigarettes. It's a choice to smoke. It's a choice to eat a big mac. It's a choice to drink. The government should have to tax us to quit. To tax us because it's bad for us. We know that what we do is bad. The government always feels that they have to be big brother and look out for us. Putting a tax on cigarettes isn't going to help anybody and it really is going to increase poverty and crime. This tax is suppose to off set health care cost. What ever happened to the 2 billion Wisconsin got for the lawsuit that we got from the cigarette companies? That was suppose to of set the health care expenses as well. The casinos will do better now since the Indians don't have to pay taxes on their cigarettes that will help Doyle next election.
Page 1 of 1
Posted on May 17 at 8:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
He could take the wall and build a wall in the new place. It wouldn't be that hard to transfer the old wall to the new place. I'm sure it's just tacked up somehow. He should build a wall in the new place and put the old wall next to it. The tradition needs to continue. Edmund don't let down the hundreds of students who signed the wall. It's what makes the I-House the I-House.
On Save the Wall